Preprints
https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-20
https://doi.org/10.5194/jecats-2026-20
21 Oct 2026
 | 21 Oct 2026
Status: this preprint is currently under review for the journal JECATS.

Differentiable CoCiP: exact sensitivities of contrail energy forcing with DIFFCOCIP v1.0

Ramon Dalmau, Philippe Very, Gabriel Jarry, and Franck Ballerini

Abstract. Reducing contrail warming requires knowing how a flight's climate effect responds to changes in its trajectory, the weather and the contrail model's assumptions. The Contrail Cirrus Prediction model (CoCiP) computes this effect as energy forcing, EF, but its reference implementation does not provide these sensitivities. Finite differences could estimate them by perturbing one input at a time, but this is impractical for weather fields holding millions of values. We present diffcocip v1.0, a reimplementation that applies reverse-mode automatic differentiation to obtain all these sensitivities in a single backward pass. It reproduces the reference model's EF to the accumulated floating-point round-off and returns derivatives with respect to waypoint altitudes, gridded humidity and model parameters. Three applications assess the use and limits of these derivatives. In a four-season fleet campaign, altitude gradients guide the placement of candidate manoeuvre windows, and every candidate is then evaluated with the unmodified model. For about one third of reprofiled flights, the selected manoeuvre reduces EF despite a gradient prediction of an increase, showing why finite manoeuvres must still be checked against the full model. Humidity gradients identify the small part of a four-dimensional weather grid that influences one flight's EF, including positions reached by its drifting contrail after the aircraft has passed. Among six model parameters, EF proves most sensitive to the humidity-correction coefficient, whose effect is about 7 times larger than that of the next most influential parameter. The derivatives are exact within each smooth region of the implemented model, but do not capture discontinuous changes across the formation, persistence and termination thresholds. diffcocip also includes an optional smoothed formulation of these criteria to support gradient-based optimisation; the results reported here use the unmodified model throughout.

Publisher's note: Copernicus Publications remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims made in the text, published maps, institutional affiliations, or any other geographical representation in this paper. While Copernicus Publications makes every effort to include appropriate place names, the final responsibility lies with the authors. Views expressed in the text are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher.
Share
Ramon Dalmau, Philippe Very, Gabriel Jarry, and Franck Ballerini

Status: open (until 16 Dec 2026)

Comment types: AC – author | RC – referee | CC – community | EC – editor | CEC – chief editor | : Report abuse
Ramon Dalmau, Philippe Very, Gabriel Jarry, and Franck Ballerini
Ramon Dalmau, Philippe Very, Gabriel Jarry, and Franck Ballerini
Metrics will be available soon.
Latest update: 26 Oct 2026
Download
Short summary
Flying a few hundred feet higher or lower can turn a warming contrail into a cooling one, or avoid it entirely, but testing this for every flight by trial and error is too costly. We built a tool that computes, in one pass, how a flight's contrail warming would change with its altitude, the surrounding humidity, and the model's own assumptions. This pinpoints promising altitude changes, shows which weather data matters, and reveals which modelling assumptions most affect predicted warming.
Share